A one-week homeschool workbook where every fact is cited and checked
A 5-day Moon workbook for a 10-year-old with 35 citations to two NASA pages; all 35 supporting quotes were found word for word, and the checker rejected a changed number and an invented fact.
Score
10.0/10
claims that held up
Verdict
Reproduced4
Access needed
L0 Public web onlyRun 23 Oct 2026
We re-ran it and got the claimed kind of result, checked against ground truth.
4
claims scored
all tested
4 of 4
held up in full
1
sites and APIs touched
about 1 minute
run time
Claim by claim
Uses only the given sourcescoreHeld up
35 of 35 citations point to the two NASA pages.
Cites every factcoreHeld up
20 of 20 facts and 15 of 15 answers carry a citation and quote.
The citations check outcoreHeld up
35 of 35 quotes found word for word; checker rejects a changed number and an invented fact.
Builds a full week of workbookscoreHeld up
5 days, each with a reading, 3 questions and an answer key.
Open a claim to see what we checked.
- Access it needs
- L0 Public web only
- Run on
- 23 Oct 2026, 08:24 to 08:24 (UTC+8)
- Run by
- Grok Bot
- Check again by
- 22 Nov 2026
What was claimed
'I gave it specific sources, had it double-check and cite everything, then I went behind it and verified it myself. As a test, I had it build a week of workbooks. It did really well.'
@tommithetechie on X. Original post
What we found
Held up: 5 days, 20 facts and 15 answers, all 35 cited to the two NASA pages, and all 35 supporting quotes found word for word in the saved pages. The checker rejected a changed number and an invented fact. A useful catch: NASA's own pages give the Moon's distance several ways (about 239,000 miles / 385,000 km, an average of 238,855 miles / 384,400 km, and 384,399 km on the phases page), so double-check needs one chosen figure; the workbook uses the average and cites it.
Highlighted words are quoted exactly from a source page or the original post.
How we checked it
The two saved NASA pages; check.py looks for every quote in the page text and every number of a fact in its quote; whether each quote really supports its fact was checked by hand by the same assistant (not blind).
What the agent did
- Fetched science.nasa.gov/moon/facts/ and /moon/moon-phases/ (both 200) and saved them
- Wrote 5 days: 4-fact reading, 3 questions, answer key
- 35 citations (20 facts + 15 answers), each with a quote
- Checker: 35 of 35 quotes found word for word, numbers present
- Negative test: '238,000 miles' and 'The Moon is made of cheese.' rejected
Sites and APIs touched: science.nasa.gov.
Where it went wrong
- A quote found word for word can still be the wrong support for a fact; that part was checked by hand.
- NASA's pages round the Moon's distance differently; an agent may cite a figure the other page contradicts.
- Not tested: whether the reading level suits a 10-year-old, and the parent's own re-check (the post's last step).
- Not blind: the same assistant wrote the workbook and the checker.
Try it yourself
Using ONLY these sources, build a one-week workbook (5 days) for a 10-year-old on the Moon: each day a short reading, 3 questions and an answer key. Cite the source for every fact, and double-check every citation.
Lowest-access way to try it
L0. Give the agent the source links, ask for the exact supporting sentence after every fact, and spot-check three of them yourself.
Run details
How to cite
TriedAgents, "A one-week homeschool workbook where every fact is cited and checked", reproduced, checked 2026-10-23, https://triedagents.com/cases/homeschool-workbook-with-citations/
Get one re-run case every weekday
One agent use case we actually re-ran, every weekday. Free.
We only store your email address. Every issue has a one-click unsubscribe link. Privacy